Share of electric vehicles in the vehicle fleet
VI.10
4.9
%
+4.6
vs 2021
Section VI · information and analytical product
Transport and infrastructure
Damage and losses to road infrastructure, protective structures, electric vehicles.
Avalanches, mudflows, floods, rockfalls and extreme temperatures destroy road surfaces, disrupt supply chains and multiply the cost of repairing roads, bridges and railways.
- Indicators
- 11
- Official
- 9
- Combinations
- 4
- No data
- 1
Strategic documents
Targets
- Transforming the country into a transit hub (NDS-2030): modernization of infrastructure and transport corridors
Trend combinations from the report: panels share a year axis, each with its own scale. “Index = 100” mode rebases series to the first year on a single scale. Hollow markers indicate unofficial data.
VI-1 Double chart
Road infrastructure vulnerability and hazardous natural phenomena
Source: Form No. 1-IK (Ministry of Transport, CoES, Local authorities); unofficial: test dataUpdated: 18.10.2026 · form of 01.09.2026
Rationale for the combination
A combined analysis of the number of hazardous phenomena and the scale of damage and losses determines the effectiveness of adaptation policy: under effective policy, the gap between the trends is at its widest.
VI-2 Double chart
Pace of road adaptation and hazardous natural phenomena
Source: Form No. 1-IK (Ministry of Transport, CoES); unofficial: calculated from form, test dataUpdated: 18.10.2026 · form of 01.09.2026
Rationale for the combination
Shows the extent to which the scope of adaptation measures is commensurate with the task of reducing the scale of climate-related damage to road infrastructure.
VI-3 Double chart
Affected people, losses and road damage
Source: Form No. 1-IK (CoES, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Local authorities and others); unofficial: test dataUpdated: 18.10.2026 · form of 01.09.2026
Rationale for the combination
A combined analysis of losses of human health and life, economic losses and the scale of damage to roads characterizes the effectiveness of adaptation policy.
VI-4 Simple chart
Damage to roads and length of protected sections
Source: Form No. 1-IK (Ministry of Transport, CoES, Local authorities); unofficial: test dataUpdated: 18.10.2026 · form of 01.09.2026
Rationale for the combination
Comparison of damage with the length of roads provided with protective infrastructure.
The rationale was left blank in the report.
| Code | Indicator | Latest value | Source | 2021–2025 | vs previous year | Responsible agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drivers | ||||||
| VI.1 | Gas and mixed-fuel passenger cars per 1,000 people · Annually | 56.5 | Official | 1 year | — | Ministry of Internal Affairs |
| Impacts | ||||||
| VI.2 | Damaged roads (mudflows, avalanches, rockfalls) km · Annually 1 | 60 | Official | −28 | Ministry of Transport, CoES, Local authorities | |
| VI.3 | Damage to road infrastructure million somoni · Annually 1 | 2,231.3 | Official | −328.7 | Ministry of Transport, CoES, Local authorities | |
| VI.4 | People affected on roads people · Annually 1 | 17 | Official | −11 | CoES, Ministry of Internal Affairs, Local authorities | |
| Adaptation | ||||||
| VI.5 | Protective roadside tree plantings trees per km · Every 3 years 1 | 5.8 | Calc. | +0.9 | Ministry of Transport, Forestry Agency, Local authorities | |
| VI.6 | Roads protected from landslides, rockfalls and avalanches km · Not specified | 13.0 | Official | +3.9 | Ministry of Transport | |
| VI.7 | Bridges reinforced with climate change in mind units · Not specified | 17 | Official | +3 | Ministry of Transport | |
| VI.8 | Roads with climate-resilient surfacing km · Not specified | 49 | Official | +9 | Ministry of Transport | |
| VI.9 | Imports of electric vehicles units · Not specified | 20,489 | Official | +2,794 | Ministry of Transport, Customs Service | |
| VI.10 | Share of electric vehicles in the vehicle fleet % · Not specified | 4.9 | Official | +1.5 | Ministry of Transport | |
| VI.11 | Reduction in GHG emissions in transport Gg CO₂e · Not specified 1 | no data | — | no series | — | Ministry of Transport |
Indicators from other sections used in trend combinations
If several agencies are listed as responsible, the indicator is counted for each. According to the Guidelines, the first agency listed is responsible for entering the value.